2004 Mazda Demio vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Demio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Demio would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Demio. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Demio.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda Demio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Demio. (101 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Demio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda Demio | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Mazda | Citroen |
| Model | Demio | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
