2004 Mazda MPV vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2004 Mazda MPV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda MPV weights approximately 981 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MPV (260 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: