2004 Mazda MPV vs. 2010 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2010 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Mazda MPV. (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda MPV.
Because 2010 Saab 03-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (299 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MPV. (267 Nm). This means 2010 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MPV | 2010 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | MPV | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 267 Nm | 299 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4689 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1529 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2675 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 62 L |