2004 Mazda MPV vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MPV (260 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MPV | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | MPV | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |