2004 Mazda MX vs. 1954 Morris Oxford
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1954 Morris Oxford. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1954 Morris Oxford.
Because 1954 Morris Oxford is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Morris Oxford. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Morris Oxford. (88 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda MX | 1954 Morris Oxford | |
| Make | Mazda | Morris |
| Model | MX | Oxford |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2470 mm |
