2004 Mazda MX vs. 1957 Morris Minor
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Morris Minor would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1957 Morris Minor. (36 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1957 Morris Minor.
Because 1957 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Morris Minor. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 1957 Morris Minor | |
Make | Mazda | Morris |
Model | MX | Minor |
Year Released | 2004 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2190 mm |