2004 Mazda MX vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Mazda | Studebaker |
Model | MX | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 4246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2980 mm |