2004 Mazda MX vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500.
Because 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda MX | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
| Model | MX | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2430 mm |
