2004 Mazda MX vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda MX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | MX | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2540 mm |