2004 Mazda MX vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | MX | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2480 mm |