2004 Mazda MX vs. 1974 Triumph TR6
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph TR6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph TR6 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Triumph TR6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1974 Triumph TR6. (101 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph TR6.
Because 1974 Triumph TR6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Triumph TR6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph TR6. (195 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph TR6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda MX | 1974 Triumph TR6 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | MX | TR6 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2240 mm |
