2004 Mazda MX vs. 1975 Volvo 240
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 240.
Because 1975 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 1975 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | MX | 240 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2650 mm |