2004 Mazda MX vs. 1982 Renault 11
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 11 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1982 Renault 11. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 11.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mazda MX has automatic transmission and 1982 Renault 11 has manual transmission. 1982 Renault 11 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mazda MX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 1982 Renault 11 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | MX | 11 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1106 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2490 mm |