2004 Mazda MX vs. 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier. (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 1999 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | MX | Cavalier |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2190 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2650 mm |