2004 Mazda MX vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (189 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda MX | 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | MX | Vision |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 189 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2940 mm |
