2004 Mazda MX vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2000 Volvo V40. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo V40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo V40. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo V40. 2004 Mazda MX has automatic transmission and 2000 Volvo V40 has manual transmission. 2000 Volvo V40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mazda MX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | MX | V40 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 207 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |