2004 Mazda MX vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda MX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda MX would be higher. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2004 Mazda MX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda MX.
Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda MX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MX. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | MX | Equator |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 3953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3560 mm |