2004 Mazda MX vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda MX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda MX would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Mazda MX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda MX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MX. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda MX | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | MX | BLS |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |
