2004 Mazda MX vs. 2012 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2012 Fiat Croma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda MX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda MX would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Croma (197 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2004 Mazda MX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda MX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Croma (401 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda MX. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda MX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda MX | 2012 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Mazda | Fiat |
Model | MX | Croma |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2387 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 401 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 90.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |