2004 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1964 Volvo 120

To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 120. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 382 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 120. (145 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 120.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mazda RX-8 1964 Volvo 120
Make Mazda Volvo
Model RX-8 120
Year Released 2004 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2616 cc 1778 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 189 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 3800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1392 kg 1010 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 45 L