2004 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 572 kg more than 1979 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda RX-8 | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-8 | 66 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |