2004 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Tercel. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Tercel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 572 kg more than 1980 Toyota Tercel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda RX-8 | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-8 | Tercel |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |