2004 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda RX-8 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-8 | 66 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |