2004 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (155 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 103 kg more than 2004 Mazda RX-8.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda RX-8 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | RX-8 | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 82 L |
