2004 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda RX-8 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-8 | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |