2004 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 127 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2004 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda RX-8 | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | RX-8 | Cooper |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |