2004 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2013 Subaru Forester

To start off, 2013 Subaru Forester is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2013 Subaru Forester. (168 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2013 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Forester weights approximately 136 kg more than 2004 Mazda RX-8.

Because 2013 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Subaru Forester (236 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mazda RX-8 2013 Subaru Forester
Make Mazda Subaru
Model RX-8 Forester
Year Released 2004 2013
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2616 cc 2500 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary electric
Horse Power 189 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 236 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 4100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1392 kg 1528 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 2006 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2615 mm