2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 746 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda Tribute | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | Tribute | Herald |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 266 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 29 L |
