2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 1966 Mini MK I
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 771 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (183 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda Tribute | 1966 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Mazda | Mini |
| Model | Tribute | MK I |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2040 mm |
