2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. Both 2004 Mazda Tribute and 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass are equipped with a 2,966 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 186 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda Tribute | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Tribute | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 266 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |
