2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 1983 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 656 kg more than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Tribute | 1983 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Mazda | Skoda |
Model | Tribute | Rapid R |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 266 Nm | 99 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 47 L |