2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 142 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee (305 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda Tribute | 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mazda | Jeep |
| Model | Tribute | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3963 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 266 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 98.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 86.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1648 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 87 L |
