2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 30 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Tribute | 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | Tribute | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 266 Nm | 251 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1536 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2740 mm |