2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 856 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda Tribute | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | Tribute | Smart |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 53 HP |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
