2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Ford Falcon. (200 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 75 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda Tribute | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | Tribute | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 266 Nm | 357 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1581 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2930 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |
