2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 2007 Volvo C30
To start off, 2007 Volvo C30 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. Both 2004 Mazda Tribute and 2007 Volvo C30 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volvo C30 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Volvo C30 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volvo C30 (320 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (183 Nm). This means 2007 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Tribute | 2007 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Tribute | C30 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 18.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 1421 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 52 L |