2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 2010 BMW 760
To start off, 2010 BMW 760 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 760 (535 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 334 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 760 weights approximately 774 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 760 (745 Nm) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 2010 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Tribute | 2010 BMW 760 | |
Make | Mazda | BMW |
Model | Tribute | 760 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 535 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 266 Nm | 745 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5215 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3211 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 82 L |