2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 16 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Tribute | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Tribute | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 266 Nm | 232 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 62 L |