2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 2010 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2010 Ford Maverick is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2010 Ford Maverick. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Maverick weights approximately 9 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Tribute | 2010 Ford Maverick | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Tribute | Maverick |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 266 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 62 L |