2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 2010 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Defender is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2010 Land Rover Defender. (120 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2010 Land Rover Defender. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 1202 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Defender (360 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 2010 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Tribute | 2010 Land Rover Defender | |
Make | Mazda | Land Rover |
Model | Tribute | Defender |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2402 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 266 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 94.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 2708 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 24.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |