2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 132 kg more than 2011 Volvo C30.
Because 2004 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (271 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Tribute | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Tribute | C30 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1583 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |