2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 159 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda Tribute | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | Tribute | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 266 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
