2004 Mazda Tribute vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (562 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 98 kg more than 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (271 Nm). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda Tribute | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
Make | Mazda | Lamborghini |
Model | Tribute | Gallardo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 562 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 540 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92.8 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1583 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4386 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1184 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |