2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 1953 Skoda 1200
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Skoda 1200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1953 Skoda 1200. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1953 Skoda 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Skoda 1200 weights approximately 270 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Skoda 1200. (74 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Crossblade | 1953 Skoda 1200 | |
| Make | MCC | Skoda |
| Model | Crossblade | 1200 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2690 mm |
