2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 1963 NSU Wankel Spider
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 1,000 cc, 1963 NSU Wankel Spider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 40 kg more than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC Crossblade | 1963 NSU Wankel Spider | |
Make | MCC | NSU |
Model | Crossblade | Wankel Spider |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1000 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 50 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2030 mm |