2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 1971 ZIL 114
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 ZIL 114 (296 HP) has 226 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1971 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2435 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 ZIL 114 (581 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 479 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1971 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC Crossblade | 1971 ZIL 114 | |
Make | MCC | ZIL |
Model | Crossblade | 114 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1971 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 581 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 3770 mm |