2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 1972 Steyr 126
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Steyr 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Steyr 126 would be higher. At 643 cc (2 cylinders), 1972 Steyr 126 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1972 Steyr 126. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1972 Steyr 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 155 kg more than 1972 Steyr 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 MCC Crossblade | 1972 Steyr 126 | |
Make | MCC | Steyr |
Model | Crossblade | 126 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 24 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 1850 mm |