2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 1973 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,166 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1973 Toyota Corolla. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1973 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Toyota Corolla weights approximately 80 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Toyota Corolla. (94 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2004 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Crossblade | 1973 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Crossblade | Corolla |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2340 mm |
