2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 1979 Nissan Silvia

To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Nissan Silvia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Nissan Silvia would be higher. At 1,770 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Nissan Silvia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Nissan Silvia (97 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Nissan Silvia should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Nissan Silvia weights approximately 270 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Nissan Silvia (148 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1979 Nissan Silvia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade. 1979 Nissan Silvia has automatic transmission and 2004 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2004 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Nissan Silvia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: