2004 MCC Crossblade vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Century would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Century (90 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Buick Century has automatic transmission and 2004 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2004 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Buick Century will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 MCC Crossblade | 1982 Buick Century | |
| Make | MCC | Buick |
| Model | Crossblade | Century |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 90 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1364 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2662 mm |
